| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Haatakan Reppola
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
20
   |
Posted - 2015.06.04 22:54:56 -
[1] - Quote
Sobaan Tali wrote:People have been asking for a pass on missiles (or at least certain ones, some more dire than others). This could be CCP's answer. Surely they are not just gonna introduce some TE for missiles and that's it, since that would not be the problem all missiles have, are they? Then again, we can only assume what it will do...we'll have to wait and see if anything comes of it.
Lets all wait for the nerf that mean any missile ship need 2-3 of these modules to get back to where they are now... |
Haatakan Reppola
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
21
|
Posted - 2015.06.05 00:06:52 -
[2] - Quote
Sobaan Tali wrote:Haatakan Reppola wrote:Sobaan Tali wrote:People have been asking for a pass on missiles (or at least certain ones, some more dire than others). This could be CCP's answer. Surely they are not just gonna introduce some TE for missiles and that's it, since that would not be the problem all missiles have, are they? Then again, we can only assume what it will do...we'll have to wait and see if anything comes of it. Lets all wait for the nerf that mean any missile ship need 2-3 of these modules to get back to where they are now... That's exactly what I'm afraid of happening...and this is exactly what could do just that. Remember freighters?
yes, tried to tell people befor the freighter changes that it would come with some serious nerf to "compensate" for the ability to fit module/rig
If they can add tracking modules without gimping the base stats on missiles it would be a good change. Frig/Cruisers dont realy have the room or need for tracking module and battleship/dread need could use some help with application. Its not like battleships/phoenix are OP with missiles, everyone would be using them so trading tank/dps (low or med slot) for application cant be that OP either :P |
Haatakan Reppola
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
25
|
Posted - 2015.06.05 17:02:36 -
[3] - Quote
Arya Regnar wrote:Haatakan Reppola wrote:Sobaan Tali wrote:Haatakan Reppola wrote:Sobaan Tali wrote:People have been asking for a pass on missiles (or at least certain ones, some more dire than others). This could be CCP's answer. Surely they are not just gonna introduce some TE for missiles and that's it, since that would not be the problem all missiles have, are they? Then again, we can only assume what it will do...we'll have to wait and see if anything comes of it. Lets all wait for the nerf that mean any missile ship need 2-3 of these modules to get back to where they are now... That's exactly what I'm afraid of happening...and this is exactly what could do just that. Remember freighters? yes, tried to tell people befor the freighter changes that it would come with some serious nerf to "compensate" for the ability to fit module/rig If they can add tracking modules without gimping the base stats on missiles it would be a good change. Frig/Cruisers dont realy have the room or need for tracking module and battleship/dread need could use some help with application. Its not like battleships/phoenix are OP with missiles, everyone would be using them so trading tank/dps (low or med slot) for application cant be that OP either :P Except the freighter "nerf" didnt really happen. You can get almost same EHP and same cargo with the option to get a lot more of either. And then there are virtually unkillable JFs with 1 mil ehp...
Yout talkin deadspace fit slaved armor freighters can get same EHP and cargo? What about the natural shield tankers that have most of their EHP in shield or structure? A Charon need 3 Cargo Extenders to reach the same cargo space it had before (3 extenders = 200k more cargo, 2 extenders = 40k less) |
Haatakan Reppola
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
31
|
Posted - 2015.06.07 20:50:48 -
[4] - Quote
Arya Regnar wrote:Haatakan Reppola wrote:
Yout talkin deadspace fit slaved armor freighters can get same EHP and cargo? What about the natural shield tankers that have most of their EHP in shield or structure? A Charon need 3 Cargo Extenders to reach the same cargo space it had before (3 extenders = 200k more cargo, 2 extenders = 40k less)
You have the ability to select what they do and freighters are way safer than they were before because of it.
I agree it was a boost to armor freighters and jump freighters. The Caldari line got screwed by those changes, Charon with Bulkheads get less than 50% of the cargo space it used to have, with meta 13 (best deadspace) armor tank it have around same tank as a Providence that use no modules.
Have not undocked with my Charon since the changes, there is very little reason to ever use a freighter and even less reason to use a Caldari freighter. Before the changes all the freighters had something going for them, cargo/speed/align/ehp that changed for the worse and i suspect the "choice" we get from missile application modules would do the same |
| |
|